There is always going to be a hike or a climb that is less accessible. It might change over time, but I think there will always be a place to truly get away.

In the meantime, these touristy spots open up places to those who could never have saw then otherwise.

We took my wife's grandmother up the sea to sky gondola in her late 70's and she had a huge group cheering her on as she pushed her walker across the suspension bridge. It's one anecdotal story of course, but for me, that moment made it all make sense. It was a wonderful memory for her and her last true adventure and she loved it.

Nothing is perfect in life, but generally, if you love something, the more others love that same thing means more opportunity for it in the future 😀

Let me get off my soapbox now!

Expand full comment

We often take our stressed family on trips to more obvious accessible places locally. Nashville and Williamson County have done an excellent job of creating parks and wildlife sanctuaries among the remaining wilder places. Normally more at home in the Colorado Rockies and Sierra Mountain wilderness we happily accept the trade offs. But these localities prove it's not necessary to completely decimate the wilder places to achieve accessibility.

Expand full comment

Okay, I'll bite! I'm easily the grumpiest guy you'll meet on a crowded hike, and in any place where the ease of access to a scenic view is exploited (especially by those in vehicles) I'll be boiling.

This has everything to do with me, of course. It's self-righteous. I've learned enough about myself that, on a recent trip to Colorado, my wife's family made a drive (a drive!) up to the top of Pike's Peak, while I stayed well ensconced at Mueller State Park and did a solo hike to the back country. My wife's family is from Indiana: mountain views are very unique, and there should be some sympathy since a short hike in Mueller was difficult because of the elevation alone. These are fit people, mind you, who care for their body. Still, they don't know how to hike.

I agree with you that the tourist attractions are necessary evils for the conservation experience. They are spaces for those who are either lazy or inexperienced to get a sense of that sublimity that we're all looking for. And perhaps it will pull enough on people to want to continue that.

I have more to say but I hear my children stirring, so I'll just leave this here and come back to see what others have said, later.

Expand full comment